Recent proposals in the Ohio legislature would expand state farm lending policies, expanding access to credit and enabling more farmers to obtain farm loans. The legislation currently under consideration is House Bill 415 and Senate Bill 281, both of which would reform Ohio’s Agricultural Linked Deposit program, known as Ag-LINK. The goal of Ag-LINK, according to state agricultural officials, is to offer farmers and ranchers interest rate reduction on farm loans offered through the Ohio treasurer’s office.
To date, Ag-LINK has helped tens of thousands of Ohio farmers obtain the capital needed to start or expand their agricultural operation, allowing existing farmers to expand their businesses and offering affordable farm loans to new farmers, who often lack significant assets. Helping young farmers has been a particularly important part of Ag-LINK’s mission statement, according to officials at the Ohio Farm Bureau. Without support from the state, many potential farmers would be unable to obtain needed farm loans and would be prevented from entering the increasingly aging farm industry. Without new farmers, many experts fear for the longevity and stability of agricultural production in the United States.
In addition to specific benefits to the agricultural sector, expanding farm credit and access to farm loans is beneficial to the larger state and national economy. Officials from the U.S. Department of Agriculture and major farm advocacy groups all agree that a healthy farm industry translates into increased job creation, leading many state agricultural officials to portray increasing access to farm loans as a way to strengthen state economies. Aside from directly employing hundreds of thousands of individuals across the country, the farm sector has a symbiotic relationship with countless American industries, from veterinary services to mechanics. Expanding access to farm credit and farms loans guarantees stronger local economies, something of critical importance in the economically ravaged Midwest.
The legislation in question would raise current caps on individual borrowing and increase state funding for the Ag-LINK program. Current caps on reduced interest farm loans are set at $100,000, which would be raised to $150,000 if the proposed bills pass. In addition, the legislation would increase the program’s maximum annual funding from $125 million to $165 million. This increased funding from the state would expand the fiscal stability of the program and would guarantee that more farmers could qualify for low-interest farm loans.
After months of political wrangling over the federal deficit and agricultural spending, many farmers hoped that 2012 would open with swift action taken by Washington to ratify the Farm Bill, whose passage would ensure that farmers have access to much needed federal support and farm loans. However, as the 2012 election cycle begins, many farmers are feeling increasingly pessimistic about the likelihood of the bill’s passage, with many increasingly worried about their ability to obtain much needed federally backed farm loans in the face of the Farm Bill’s congressional limbo.
The current Farm Bill, officially known as the Food, Conservation, and Energy Act of 2008, focused heavily on rural development and renewable energy, offering grants and farm loans to support the creation of renewable energy systems. In addition, the bill reformed current agricultural lending practices. Several of its provisions, for example, increased borrowing limits for farmers, increasing the ability of agricultural producers to obtain needed farm loans. Of particular concern to many farmers were provisions dealing with emergency loans. The 2008 Farm Bill expanded access to federal emergency funding and recovery-focused farm loans, allowing many farmers to survive the recent nationwide string of extreme weather.
Despite the necessity of many of these federal programs, they are in danger of shutting down due to the Farm Bill’s impending expiration. This shutdown threatens many farmers’ access to farm loans, emergency funding, and energy grants. The charged political climate of Washington, many farmers and politicians say, makes it extremely unlikely that a new Farm Bill could be passed by the end of the year. While some politicians are discussing an emergency extension of the 2008 Farm Bill, many worry that the failure to write a new bill could lead to major program delays and could prevent many farmers and ranchers from receiving the farm loans they need.
Several politicians have released statements decrying the gridlock in Congress. Indiana Representative Marlin Stutzman, for example, reiterated that he and his colleagues were sent to Washington to do their jobs and fight for the interests of their constituents, who rely on access to farm loans and federal agricultural support.
Farm bill extensions are nothing new in Washington and have been used several times in the last two decades. In 2007, however, the extension led to massive bureaucratic headaches and caused major delays in the implementation of vital programs, including major farm loans programs. In addition to creating bureaucratic red tape and funding delays, the failure to renew the Farm Bill could create significant insecurity among farmers, who use federal programs as a bellwether. Without guaranteed access to federal programs and federal farm loans, many farmers are currently in a state of limbo, forced to prepare for their 2013 planting season with little idea of how future agricultural programs will shape up.
Earlier this week, federal judge Paul Friedman approved a settlement proposed by the Department of Agriculture that would end a decades old struggle between black farmers and the USDA. Claiming that they had been the subject of ongoing racial discrimination, particularly with regards to the availability of federal loans, thousands of black farmers joined a class action lawsuit against the USDA.
After a settlement was initial agreed upon, ending the lawsuit itself, the farmers in question found themselves having to jump through several more hoops in order to appease an austerity obsessed Congress and lawsuits to block the implementation of the settlement. Judge Friedman’s ruling clears the way for the settlement to go through.
Up to 68,000 African American farmers who can demonstrate discrimination by the USDA could be eligible for a part of the $1.25 billion settlement. Qualified claimants could receive one of two payments, an uncontested $50,000 payment, or up to $250,000 if damages can be documented and substantiated.
In a statement after the judge’s ruling, President Obama said, “[this] is another important step forward in addressing an unfortunate chapter in USDA’s civil rights history. This agreement will provide overdue relief and justice to African-American farmers and bring us closer to the ideals of freedom and equality that this country was founded on.”
To learn more about agricultural financing opportunities contact a Farm Plus Financial representative by calling 866-929-5585 or by visiting www.farmplusfinancial.com.
In 1781, in his Notes on the State of Virginia, Thomas Jefferson stated that the “cultivators of the earth are the most virtuous and independent citizens.” A few years later, in a letter to James Madison, he argued that farmers and small landowners were vital to the security and economic viability of the United States. Despite the many changes that American agriculture has undergone, it remains as important to the national economy today as it did in the eighteenth century. Beginning with Jeffersonian ideals of small yeomen farmers, to modern agribusiness, agricultural production has been a major factor in the economic stability of the US. Vital to this agricultural growth has been the development of agricultural lending practices that have made land available to cash strapped farmers. Beginning at the turn of the 20th century, the federal government has understood the value of making money available to agricultural concerns. Developing in tandem with the economic and industrial growth of the United States, lending practices and policies have helped propel agriculture in the United States and have preserved and protected this vital economic interest throughout the years.
The early Republic’s economy was primarily agrarian. The United States had few major industrial businesses and relied heavily on farming and agricultural development. At the same time, however, the early United States had few centralized banking institutions capable of dispensing credit. The Bank of the United States was short-lived and failed to provide significant credit to American farmers. The lack of farm credit, however, was not a significant problem in the eighteenth and early nineteenth century due to the structure of American agriculture. Large-scale Southern agriculture, the backbone of the US economy, was largely self-financed by wealthy plantation owners. Smaller Northern farms were much less commercialized and thus had little need for large-scale access to credit. The strength of American agriculture quickly made the United States a major economic power. Southern agricultural products, for example, drove Northern manufacturing and industry and the international export of American agricultural products generated millions of dollars in revenue. The sectional tensions of the 1850s and the Civil War helped to disrupt this traditional system and radically changed the structure of American agriculture. In 1862, Congress, emboldened by the secession of Southern states, passed the Homestead Act, opening up Western land to farmers and settlers. American citizens who had reached the age of majority could file claims for 160 acres of Western public land. After living on that land for five years and paying a small fee, up to ten dollars in the early years of the Act, they received title to the land. The Homestead Act, combined with increased Western land speculation, opened up the Great Plains and the Western United States to agricultural development and settlement and allowed for the future development and commercialization of American agriculture.[1]
Following the Civil War, agricultural prices dropped. In addition, Gilded Age economic politics sought to control inflation and limit the cash supply in the United States. A strict gold standard helped keep currency out of supply. These economic policies tended to hit farmers hardest and, in the 1880s and 90s, various agricultural and rural political movements campaigned to expand credit to American farmers. Starting with the Grange movement and the Farmers Alliance, these groups eventually coalesced into the Populist Party. One the principle demands of the Populists was the creation of a subtreasury system, which was designed to help farmers get access to credit and to help increase the monetary supply. The subtreasury system would allow farmers to turn over major crops, such as wheat or cotton, to the federal government in exchange for loans up to 80% of the value of the crop. If the value of the crop rose above the value of the loan, the crops could be sold to settle the debt. If it did not, the crops would be forfeited to the government.[2] Although the Populists never became a viable third party, their agricultural policies would resonate nationally.
Despite the political failure of the Populist Party, farmer’s concerns regarding credit were eventually adopted by the Democratic and Republican Parties. In the early 1900s, President Theodore Roosevelt created a commission to determine and address the major concerns of American farmers. Unsurprisingly, credit reform remained their principle political desire. In the election of 1912, all three major parties, the Democrats, Republicans, and the Progressive Party, endorsed platforms pledging to create an agricultural credit system. In 1913, Democratic President Woodrow Wilson sent a committee to Europe to study and report on the various agricultural credit systems implemented by the European Great Powers. In 1916, after two years of congressional debates, Congress passed the Farm Loan Act. The act authorized the creation of 12 federal land banks as well as a system of private land banks. The federal government provided the initial capital for the cooperative land banks and regulated and controlled the interest rates of agricultural loans.[3] These land banks experienced sporadic growth in their early years. The late 1910s and early 1920s saw little growth in these credit institutions. Agricultural prices had risen in the mid 1900s and grew dramatically during World War 1. Higher farm prices eased the need for credit in many American farms. This agricultural boom was short-lived, however, and towards the end of the 1920s, farm prices fell and the US economy lurched into a serious depression.[4]
In response to the postwar recession and the Great Depression, President Franklin Roosevelt, elected in 1932, took swift action to stabilize the agricultural sector. In addition to federal legislation regulating agricultural prices, Roosevelt provided additional loans to farmers through the Commodity Credit Corporation, created in 1933. The CCC was the realization of the subtreasury system advocated by the Farmers’ Alliance and the Populists in the late 1800s. The CCC allowed farmers to receive loans based on the prices for their particular crops. If the crop prices rose higher than the loan rate, farmers could sell their products, pay off their loan, and keep any profits. If it dropped below the loan rate than their crops were forfeit and the debt cancelled.[5] In addition to the CCC, the federal government reformed the farm credit system through the passage of the 1933 Farm Mortgage Act and the Farm Credit Act. These acts unified federal agricultural credit organizations into the Farm Credit Administration. In addition, the Farm Mortgage Act expanded the activities of the federal land banks and increased the money available to farmers through emergency credit. The Farm Credit Act created production credit associations which made short and intermediate-term loans to farmers. It also created twelve district banks to support and extend credit to the cooperative associates. These Farm Credit Banks, along with the CCC, became the principal federal lenders to farmers and agricultural businesses.[6] In 1937, the Roosevelt administration created the Farm Security Administration, which provided loans to farmers who needed assistance in meeting daily expenses in order to remain on their land. The FSA worked with famers, helping to assess the viability of their farms, developing soil conservation practices, while fashioning plans for farm operations and expenditures. In return for this large-scale government planning, farmers who otherwise could not receive loans from other financial institutions were able to stay on their land.[7]
The beginning of World War 2 saw a significant increase in agricultural prices as domestic and international demand grew during the war years. Unlike the end of World War 1, agricultural prices remained high following the end of the war due to continued demand caused by the end of rationing in belligerent nations and the increased foreign aid sent to Europe and Asia. The postwar years in fact saw the increasing commercialization of farms throughout the United States. Increased prices allowed farmers to further mechanize their farms, and the increasing reliance on mechanical improvements and technological and chemical advancements completed the heretofore gradual commercialization of US agriculture. In 1930, for example, there were nearly 7 million farms in the United States. By 1970, there were only 3 million. Adapting to the changing nature of agriculture, the federal government took gradual steps to alter its existing agricultural lending apparatus. In 1972, Congress passed the Consolidated Farm and Rural Development Act, also known as the Con Act, which expanded the lending powers of the Department of Agriculture, empowering the agency to make direct ownership, operating, and emergency disaster loans to farmers. In addition, it allowed for rural development loans and grants.[8]
The rural boom, which had lasted throughout the postwar years, abruptly ended in the 1980s. As inflation rose and farm prices dropped, the United States faced a serious agricultural depression. In response to the financial crisis, the government passed the Agricultural Credit Act of 1987. This act authorized a $4 billion package to aid fiscally vulnerable institutions of the Farm Credit System. It also served to restructure delinquent loans, created an insurance mechanism to protect FCS loans, and, most importantly, set up a secondary market for agricultural real estate loans through the creation of the Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation, better known as Farmer Mac.[9] Designed to help the struggling Farm Credit System, Farmer Mac established a secondary agricultural real estate market and increased long-term credit with stable interest rates to farmers and ranchers. In order to meet its goals, Farmer Mac purchases agricultural loans from lenders, replenishing their funds and allowing them to make further loans to agricultural borrowers.In order to fund their purchases, Farmer Mac sells debts and securities on the capital market, guaranteeing a flow of money from Wall Street investors to rural farmers.[10] Since its creation in 1987, Farmer Mac’s authority has been modified four times. In 1990, Congress created the Farmer Mac II program, at the request of the USDA, which provides the support of the secondary market to USDA guaranteed loans and allows lenders to sell portions of guaranteed USDA loans to Farmer Mac. In 1991, Farmer Mac was amended and subjected to moderate capital regulation by the federal government, in 1996 its purchasing processes were streamlined, and in 2008 Farmer Mac was allowed to purchase loans made to finance electrification and telecommunication improvements in rural areas.[11] The modifications made in the 1990s transformed Farmer Mac into a widely profitable institution. Since 1995, Farmer Mac has increased its capital from $12 million to over $100 million in 2001.[12]
Thanks in part to thoughtful government actions and regulations, Farmer Mac, unlike similar government-sponsored enterprises like Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, remains fiscally sound and has weathered the current economic crisis. While government actions to manage and regulate agriculture lending may have lagged over the years in comparison to other forms of banking and credit developments, the government has frequently taken decisive action to protect and support agriculture in the United States. The development of farm lending systems and institutions has helped the agricultural sector develop into the economically powerful system that exists today.
[1] Willard W. Cochrane, Development of American Agriculture: A Historical Analysis (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1993), 81-84.
[2] R. Douglas Hurt, American Agriculture: A Brief History (Ames, Iowa: Iowa State University Press, 1994), 208.
[3] Neil E. Hart, “History and Unique Features of the Farm Credit System,” Choices, 1st Quarter 2005, 11; Cochran, Development of American Agriculture, 112
The United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) is offering low-rate farm loans for building or upgrading farm storage and handling facilities. The Farm Storage Facility Loan (FSFL) is part of the USDA Commodity Credit Corporation (CCC).
Those looking to build storage for : corn, soybeans, oats, wheat, barley, oil seeds, pulse crops, renewable biomass, hay and fruits and vegetables (cold storage facilities).
Farm loans are available up to $500,000 and participants must put down at 15 percent and the CCC provides the remaining 85 percent for the total cost of the project. Farm loans are available for 7, 10 or 12 years depending on the total amount of the loan. As of April 2010 the rate is 3.125 percent.
The USDA advises producers to wait for farm loan approval before building the storage facilities just in case the application is denied.
For more information visit the Farm Service Agency’s Website or visit your local Farm Service Agency office.
Federal Reserve stated interest rates likely to rise. Refinance your farm loan before rates go up. Call a representative by dialing 866-929-5585 or visit us online.
Socially disadvantaged farmers in Madison and Yazoo counties (MISSISSIPPI) can apply for loans with the local Farm Service Agency to buy and operate farms.
Women, Hispanics, Native Americans, Asians and African Americans qualify for this program developed by Congress. Those who qualify can apply for a farm ownership loan at the FSA office. The agency can sell or lease to anyone who qualifies.
Loans are also available for operations and early business costs. Regardless if you feel you qualify or not, all farmers are encouraged to apply.
Looking to make your farming dream a reality? Contact Farm Plus today! Low-rate loans are available and we work alongside government agencies to get you the farm loans you need. Call 866-929-5585 or visit our website for more information.
Farmer Mac, the Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation announced that the Board of Directors officially appointed Michael A. Gerber as the president and chief executive director. A member of the Farmer Mac Board since June 2007, Gerber took on responsibility as acting president and CEO in October while the board looked for a new CEO. His past experience includes serving as President and Chief Executive Officer at Farm Credit of Western New York.
Acting Chairman of the Board Lowell Junkins said, “Mike Gerber has provided tremendous leadership to Farmer Mac over the last five months — a critical time period for the company. During his tenure, the company has successfully raised net new capital of $115 million through private investors and implemented a new program to encourage guarantee and purchase transactions with commercial banks and Farm Credit System institutions. Mike has the vision and leadership skills to advance Farmer Mac’s mission and continue Farmer Mac’s invaluable service to rural America.”
If you are interested in purchasing agriculture land, Farm Plus works alongside programs such as Farmer Mac to help people get farm loans or ranch loans. Now is a great time to inquire about farm loans or ranch loans because of low rates. If you are interested in agriculture loans call or visit online for more information about ranch loans or farm loans.
William Edwards, an economist at the Iowa State extension program, developed a guide of financial strategies to help farmers during a time of uncertainty.
1.Prepare an accurate set of financial statements. Highly variable inventory prices and increasing land values will make this year’s balance sheet look quite different from last year’s. And for grain farmers, a net income statement for 2008 may be something you to share with your lender. Check out the handy spreadsheets under the Finance section of Ag Decision Maker Web site.
2. Prepare a detailed cash flow budget. Many crop farmers will have a hard time meeting all their cash commitments from sales in 2009. Higher input costs and rents will increase operating line requirements. Livestock farmers will need to budget feed purchases carefully. More AgDM decision tools are available to make the task easier.
3. Shop around for inputs. Depending on when suppliers booked fuel, fertilizer, pesticides and other inputs, prices may vary dramatically.
4. Consider both cost savings and yield effects when applying inputs. For example, cutting back on nitrogen fertilizer when costs are high makes sense, but only up to a point. Use the ISU Nitrogen Calculator to find the right level for current prices.
5. Know your costs of production. When profitable selling opportunities arise, lock them in. Watch for opportunities to price crop inputs, feed, and feeder livestock, as well.
6. Document yields for a possible crop insurance or SURE payment. Many crop producers will receive an insurance indemnity payment due to falling prices in 2008 as well as from damage caused by rain or floods. Additional payments may be available under the SURE disaster program in the new farm bill.
7. Increase crop insurance coverage for 2009. Higher production costs may require higher levels of protection to assure a breakeven level of revenue. Cattle, hog, sheep and dairy producers can set price floors using LGM or LRP insurance programs.
8. Consider enrolling in ACRE. Under the new farm bill program, Average Crop Revenue Election, crop producers can substitute a gross revenue protection plan for the current price counter cyclical program, with guarantees based on higher price levels and current yields.
9. Use flexible lease agreements. Tying cash rents to a formula that takes into account both yields and prices will help protect margins. Land owners can share in high profits when they are available with a flexible lease agreement.
10. Defer capital purchases. When margins are narrower, replacing machinery, putting up new storage bins, or bidding on more land may have to wait. Replacement parts and overhauls are cheaper in the short run.
11. Defer income taxes. Potential tax bills can be put off until future years through actions such as using expense method and early depreciation, deferring crop insurance payments based on yield losses, prepaying farm expenses, and using income averaging.
12. Compare financing rates. Federal interest rates are at historic lows. There may be wide differences among agricultural lenders. Marketing loans from the Farm Service Agency are also available for short term financing.
13. Consider refinancing long-term obligations. Compare possible interest savings to the costs of rewriting the loan. It may be a good time to convert variable rate loans to a fixed rate.
14. Keep assets liquid. If gross revenue is not enough to cover production costs and family living expenses this year, keep funds in savings or short-term investments rather than assets that would be hard to convert to cash.
15. Use equity in land, livestock and equipment. If cash reserves aren’t enough, talk to your lender about borrowing against fixed assets, with a multi-year repayment plan.
Although the economy does not look stable, now is just as good as any time to buy agricultural land. There are many programs designed to assist farmers in these times, and farmers can also learn how to frugally manage their books and supplies. Farm loans and farm credit is available. Contact a Farm Plus representative at 1-866-929-5585 or visit their Web site.
A recent study conducted by the University of Nebraska-Lincoln’s Nebraska Center for Energy Sciences Research, a Improvements in Life Cycle, Energy Efficiency, and Greenhouse Gas Emissions of Corn-Ethanol,†proves the implementation of corn ethanol is lowering our GHD emissions. By using corn-ethanol emissions are lowered by 48-59 percent when compared to petroleum. Not only does it lower emissions, but it also returns 29-123 percent of the energy used to produce it. Using more corn-ethanol lowers our dependency on foreign oil as well. This allows for gas prices to stay down 29-40 percent. One barrel of corn ethanol produced replaces 1.2 barrels of petroleum.
If you’re in the market for financing, whether it be for your crop operation or an ethanol plan be sure to contact Farm Plus Fianancial. Two ways to contact someone at Farm Plus, either by clicking here or call them toll free at 866-929-5585.
One of the most fun parts of having a farm is naming your new home. For most people it is a tough job putting a name on the one lifelong dream. A lot of people feel a farm should have a name so it sounds classy or businesslike. I think adding a name makes it personal and meaningful.
Names can come out of anywhere, but a lot of people name their farms after significant people, places, dreams or features of the land.
Onlineforums are dedicated to farmers looking for names, or looking to inspire others. Here are some very creative names:
*Rock Creek Gardens: Named after The Rock Creek that runs through this farm.
*Dogridge: This farm is home to dog lovers on acreage with rocky ridges through it.
*Busy Solitude Farm: Named after a quote by Votaire, “The happiest of all lives is a busy solitude.â€
* C ‘n’ J’s acres: C and J are the initials of the owners and sons.
Some states even allow you to register your farm name.
If you’ve dreamed of your own Fallen Oaks farm or C ‘n’ J’s Acres, it is a possibility! Farm loans are available. Check out the Farmer’s Financial Plus Web Site to learn more.
Look to what inspires your or is important to your life. Even if you don’t think it is “farmsy enough,†it will be creative and stand out.