Earlier this week, federal judge Paul Friedman approved a settlement proposed by the Department of Agriculture that would end a decades old struggle between black farmers and the USDA. Claiming that they had been the subject of ongoing racial discrimination, particularly with regards to the availability of federal loans, thousands of black farmers joined a class action lawsuit against the USDA.
After a settlement was initial agreed upon, ending the lawsuit itself, the farmers in question found themselves having to jump through several more hoops in order to appease an austerity obsessed Congress and lawsuits to block the implementation of the settlement. Judge Friedman’s ruling clears the way for the settlement to go through.
Up to 68,000 African American farmers who can demonstrate discrimination by the USDA could be eligible for a part of the $1.25 billion settlement. Qualified claimants could receive one of two payments, an uncontested $50,000 payment, or up to $250,000 if damages can be documented and substantiated.
In a statement after the judge’s ruling, President Obama said, “[this] is another important step forward in addressing an unfortunate chapter in USDA’s civil rights history. This agreement will provide overdue relief and justice to African-American farmers and bring us closer to the ideals of freedom and equality that this country was founded on.”
To learn more about agricultural financing opportunities contact a Farm Plus Financial representative by calling 866-929-5585 or by visiting www.farmplusfinancial.com.
In 1781, in his Notes on the State of Virginia, Thomas Jefferson stated that the “cultivators of the earth are the most virtuous and independent citizens.” A few years later, in a letter to James Madison, he argued that farmers and small landowners were vital to the security and economic viability of the United States. Despite the many changes that American agriculture has undergone, it remains as important to the national economy today as it did in the eighteenth century. Beginning with Jeffersonian ideals of small yeomen farmers, to modern agribusiness, agricultural production has been a major factor in the economic stability of the US. Vital to this agricultural growth has been the development of agricultural lending practices that have made land available to cash strapped farmers. Beginning at the turn of the 20th century, the federal government has understood the value of making money available to agricultural concerns. Developing in tandem with the economic and industrial growth of the United States, lending practices and policies have helped propel agriculture in the United States and have preserved and protected this vital economic interest throughout the years.
The early Republic’s economy was primarily agrarian. The United States had few major industrial businesses and relied heavily on farming and agricultural development. At the same time, however, the early United States had few centralized banking institutions capable of dispensing credit. The Bank of the United States was short-lived and failed to provide significant credit to American farmers. The lack of farm credit, however, was not a significant problem in the eighteenth and early nineteenth century due to the structure of American agriculture. Large-scale Southern agriculture, the backbone of the US economy, was largely self-financed by wealthy plantation owners. Smaller Northern farms were much less commercialized and thus had little need for large-scale access to credit. The strength of American agriculture quickly made the United States a major economic power. Southern agricultural products, for example, drove Northern manufacturing and industry and the international export of American agricultural products generated millions of dollars in revenue. The sectional tensions of the 1850s and the Civil War helped to disrupt this traditional system and radically changed the structure of American agriculture. In 1862, Congress, emboldened by the secession of Southern states, passed the Homestead Act, opening up Western land to farmers and settlers. American citizens who had reached the age of majority could file claims for 160 acres of Western public land. After living on that land for five years and paying a small fee, up to ten dollars in the early years of the Act, they received title to the land. The Homestead Act, combined with increased Western land speculation, opened up the Great Plains and the Western United States to agricultural development and settlement and allowed for the future development and commercialization of American agriculture.[1]
Following the Civil War, agricultural prices dropped. In addition, Gilded Age economic politics sought to control inflation and limit the cash supply in the United States. A strict gold standard helped keep currency out of supply. These economic policies tended to hit farmers hardest and, in the 1880s and 90s, various agricultural and rural political movements campaigned to expand credit to American farmers. Starting with the Grange movement and the Farmers Alliance, these groups eventually coalesced into the Populist Party. One the principle demands of the Populists was the creation of a subtreasury system, which was designed to help farmers get access to credit and to help increase the monetary supply. The subtreasury system would allow farmers to turn over major crops, such as wheat or cotton, to the federal government in exchange for loans up to 80% of the value of the crop. If the value of the crop rose above the value of the loan, the crops could be sold to settle the debt. If it did not, the crops would be forfeited to the government.[2] Although the Populists never became a viable third party, their agricultural policies would resonate nationally.
Despite the political failure of the Populist Party, farmer’s concerns regarding credit were eventually adopted by the Democratic and Republican Parties. In the early 1900s, President Theodore Roosevelt created a commission to determine and address the major concerns of American farmers. Unsurprisingly, credit reform remained their principle political desire. In the election of 1912, all three major parties, the Democrats, Republicans, and the Progressive Party, endorsed platforms pledging to create an agricultural credit system. In 1913, Democratic President Woodrow Wilson sent a committee to Europe to study and report on the various agricultural credit systems implemented by the European Great Powers. In 1916, after two years of congressional debates, Congress passed the Farm Loan Act. The act authorized the creation of 12 federal land banks as well as a system of private land banks. The federal government provided the initial capital for the cooperative land banks and regulated and controlled the interest rates of agricultural loans.[3] These land banks experienced sporadic growth in their early years. The late 1910s and early 1920s saw little growth in these credit institutions. Agricultural prices had risen in the mid 1900s and grew dramatically during World War 1. Higher farm prices eased the need for credit in many American farms. This agricultural boom was short-lived, however, and towards the end of the 1920s, farm prices fell and the US economy lurched into a serious depression.[4]
In response to the postwar recession and the Great Depression, President Franklin Roosevelt, elected in 1932, took swift action to stabilize the agricultural sector. In addition to federal legislation regulating agricultural prices, Roosevelt provided additional loans to farmers through the Commodity Credit Corporation, created in 1933. The CCC was the realization of the subtreasury system advocated by the Farmers’ Alliance and the Populists in the late 1800s. The CCC allowed farmers to receive loans based on the prices for their particular crops. If the crop prices rose higher than the loan rate, farmers could sell their products, pay off their loan, and keep any profits. If it dropped below the loan rate than their crops were forfeit and the debt cancelled.[5] In addition to the CCC, the federal government reformed the farm credit system through the passage of the 1933 Farm Mortgage Act and the Farm Credit Act. These acts unified federal agricultural credit organizations into the Farm Credit Administration. In addition, the Farm Mortgage Act expanded the activities of the federal land banks and increased the money available to farmers through emergency credit. The Farm Credit Act created production credit associations which made short and intermediate-term loans to farmers. It also created twelve district banks to support and extend credit to the cooperative associates. These Farm Credit Banks, along with the CCC, became the principal federal lenders to farmers and agricultural businesses.[6] In 1937, the Roosevelt administration created the Farm Security Administration, which provided loans to farmers who needed assistance in meeting daily expenses in order to remain on their land. The FSA worked with famers, helping to assess the viability of their farms, developing soil conservation practices, while fashioning plans for farm operations and expenditures. In return for this large-scale government planning, farmers who otherwise could not receive loans from other financial institutions were able to stay on their land.[7]
The beginning of World War 2 saw a significant increase in agricultural prices as domestic and international demand grew during the war years. Unlike the end of World War 1, agricultural prices remained high following the end of the war due to continued demand caused by the end of rationing in belligerent nations and the increased foreign aid sent to Europe and Asia. The postwar years in fact saw the increasing commercialization of farms throughout the United States. Increased prices allowed farmers to further mechanize their farms, and the increasing reliance on mechanical improvements and technological and chemical advancements completed the heretofore gradual commercialization of US agriculture. In 1930, for example, there were nearly 7 million farms in the United States. By 1970, there were only 3 million. Adapting to the changing nature of agriculture, the federal government took gradual steps to alter its existing agricultural lending apparatus. In 1972, Congress passed the Consolidated Farm and Rural Development Act, also known as the Con Act, which expanded the lending powers of the Department of Agriculture, empowering the agency to make direct ownership, operating, and emergency disaster loans to farmers. In addition, it allowed for rural development loans and grants.[8]
The rural boom, which had lasted throughout the postwar years, abruptly ended in the 1980s. As inflation rose and farm prices dropped, the United States faced a serious agricultural depression. In response to the financial crisis, the government passed the Agricultural Credit Act of 1987. This act authorized a $4 billion package to aid fiscally vulnerable institutions of the Farm Credit System. It also served to restructure delinquent loans, created an insurance mechanism to protect FCS loans, and, most importantly, set up a secondary market for agricultural real estate loans through the creation of the Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation, better known as Farmer Mac.[9] Designed to help the struggling Farm Credit System, Farmer Mac established a secondary agricultural real estate market and increased long-term credit with stable interest rates to farmers and ranchers. In order to meet its goals, Farmer Mac purchases agricultural loans from lenders, replenishing their funds and allowing them to make further loans to agricultural borrowers.In order to fund their purchases, Farmer Mac sells debts and securities on the capital market, guaranteeing a flow of money from Wall Street investors to rural farmers.[10] Since its creation in 1987, Farmer Mac’s authority has been modified four times. In 1990, Congress created the Farmer Mac II program, at the request of the USDA, which provides the support of the secondary market to USDA guaranteed loans and allows lenders to sell portions of guaranteed USDA loans to Farmer Mac. In 1991, Farmer Mac was amended and subjected to moderate capital regulation by the federal government, in 1996 its purchasing processes were streamlined, and in 2008 Farmer Mac was allowed to purchase loans made to finance electrification and telecommunication improvements in rural areas.[11] The modifications made in the 1990s transformed Farmer Mac into a widely profitable institution. Since 1995, Farmer Mac has increased its capital from $12 million to over $100 million in 2001.[12]
Thanks in part to thoughtful government actions and regulations, Farmer Mac, unlike similar government-sponsored enterprises like Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, remains fiscally sound and has weathered the current economic crisis. While government actions to manage and regulate agriculture lending may have lagged over the years in comparison to other forms of banking and credit developments, the government has frequently taken decisive action to protect and support agriculture in the United States. The development of farm lending systems and institutions has helped the agricultural sector develop into the economically powerful system that exists today.
[1] Willard W. Cochrane, Development of American Agriculture: A Historical Analysis (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1993), 81-84.
[2] R. Douglas Hurt, American Agriculture: A Brief History (Ames, Iowa: Iowa State University Press, 1994), 208.
[3] Neil E. Hart, “History and Unique Features of the Farm Credit System,” Choices, 1st Quarter 2005, 11; Cochran, Development of American Agriculture, 112
The United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) is offering low-rate farm loans for building or upgrading farm storage and handling facilities. The Farm Storage Facility Loan (FSFL) is part of the USDA Commodity Credit Corporation (CCC).
Those looking to build storage for : corn, soybeans, oats, wheat, barley, oil seeds, pulse crops, renewable biomass, hay and fruits and vegetables (cold storage facilities).
Farm loans are available up to $500,000 and participants must put down at 15 percent and the CCC provides the remaining 85 percent for the total cost of the project. Farm loans are available for 7, 10 or 12 years depending on the total amount of the loan. As of April 2010 the rate is 3.125 percent.
The USDA advises producers to wait for farm loan approval before building the storage facilities just in case the application is denied.
For more information visit the Farm Service Agency’s Website or visit your local Farm Service Agency office.
Federal Reserve stated interest rates likely to rise. Refinance your farm loan before rates go up. Call a representative by dialing 866-929-5585 or visit us online.
Socially disadvantaged farmers in Madison and Yazoo counties (MISSISSIPPI) can apply for loans with the local Farm Service Agency to buy and operate farms.
Women, Hispanics, Native Americans, Asians and African Americans qualify for this program developed by Congress. Those who qualify can apply for a farm ownership loan at the FSA office. The agency can sell or lease to anyone who qualifies.
Loans are also available for operations and early business costs. Regardless if you feel you qualify or not, all farmers are encouraged to apply.
Looking to make your farming dream a reality? Contact Farm Plus today! Low-rate loans are available and we work alongside government agencies to get you the farm loans you need. Call 866-929-5585 or visit our website for more information.
Farmer Mac, the Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation announced that the Board of Directors officially appointed Michael A. Gerber as the president and chief executive director. A member of the Farmer Mac Board since June 2007, Gerber took on responsibility as acting president and CEO in October while the board looked for a new CEO. His past experience includes serving as President and Chief Executive Officer at Farm Credit of Western New York.
Acting Chairman of the Board Lowell Junkins said, “Mike Gerber has provided tremendous leadership to Farmer Mac over the last five months — a critical time period for the company. During his tenure, the company has successfully raised net new capital of $115 million through private investors and implemented a new program to encourage guarantee and purchase transactions with commercial banks and Farm Credit System institutions. Mike has the vision and leadership skills to advance Farmer Mac’s mission and continue Farmer Mac’s invaluable service to rural America.”
If you are interested in purchasing agriculture land, Farm Plus works alongside programs such as Farmer Mac to help people get farm loans or ranch loans. Now is a great time to inquire about farm loans or ranch loans because of low rates. If you are interested in agriculture loans call or visit online for more information about ranch loans or farm loans.
William Edwards, an economist at the Iowa State extension program, developed a guide of financial strategies to help farmers during a time of uncertainty.
1.Prepare an accurate set of financial statements. Highly variable inventory prices and increasing land values will make this year’s balance sheet look quite different from last year’s. And for grain farmers, a net income statement for 2008 may be something you to share with your lender. Check out the handy spreadsheets under the Finance section of Ag Decision Maker Web site.
2. Prepare a detailed cash flow budget. Many crop farmers will have a hard time meeting all their cash commitments from sales in 2009. Higher input costs and rents will increase operating line requirements. Livestock farmers will need to budget feed purchases carefully. More AgDM decision tools are available to make the task easier.
3. Shop around for inputs. Depending on when suppliers booked fuel, fertilizer, pesticides and other inputs, prices may vary dramatically.
4. Consider both cost savings and yield effects when applying inputs. For example, cutting back on nitrogen fertilizer when costs are high makes sense, but only up to a point. Use the ISU Nitrogen Calculator to find the right level for current prices.
5. Know your costs of production. When profitable selling opportunities arise, lock them in. Watch for opportunities to price crop inputs, feed, and feeder livestock, as well.
6. Document yields for a possible crop insurance or SURE payment. Many crop producers will receive an insurance indemnity payment due to falling prices in 2008 as well as from damage caused by rain or floods. Additional payments may be available under the SURE disaster program in the new farm bill.
7. Increase crop insurance coverage for 2009. Higher production costs may require higher levels of protection to assure a breakeven level of revenue. Cattle, hog, sheep and dairy producers can set price floors using LGM or LRP insurance programs.
8. Consider enrolling in ACRE. Under the new farm bill program, Average Crop Revenue Election, crop producers can substitute a gross revenue protection plan for the current price counter cyclical program, with guarantees based on higher price levels and current yields.
9. Use flexible lease agreements. Tying cash rents to a formula that takes into account both yields and prices will help protect margins. Land owners can share in high profits when they are available with a flexible lease agreement.
10. Defer capital purchases. When margins are narrower, replacing machinery, putting up new storage bins, or bidding on more land may have to wait. Replacement parts and overhauls are cheaper in the short run.
11. Defer income taxes. Potential tax bills can be put off until future years through actions such as using expense method and early depreciation, deferring crop insurance payments based on yield losses, prepaying farm expenses, and using income averaging.
12. Compare financing rates. Federal interest rates are at historic lows. There may be wide differences among agricultural lenders. Marketing loans from the Farm Service Agency are also available for short term financing.
13. Consider refinancing long-term obligations. Compare possible interest savings to the costs of rewriting the loan. It may be a good time to convert variable rate loans to a fixed rate.
14. Keep assets liquid. If gross revenue is not enough to cover production costs and family living expenses this year, keep funds in savings or short-term investments rather than assets that would be hard to convert to cash.
15. Use equity in land, livestock and equipment. If cash reserves aren’t enough, talk to your lender about borrowing against fixed assets, with a multi-year repayment plan.
Although the economy does not look stable, now is just as good as any time to buy agricultural land. There are many programs designed to assist farmers in these times, and farmers can also learn how to frugally manage their books and supplies. Farm loans and farm credit is available. Contact a Farm Plus representative at 1-866-929-5585 or visit their Web site.
A recent study conducted by the University of Nebraska-Lincoln’s Nebraska Center for Energy Sciences Research, “Improvements in Life Cycle, Energy Efficiency, and Greenhouse Gas Emissions of Corn-Ethanol,†proves the implementation of corn ethanol is lowering our GHD emissions. By using corn-ethanol emissions are lowered by 48-59 percent when compared to petroleum. Not only does it lower emissions, but it also returns 29-123 percent of the energy used to produce it. Using more corn-ethanol lowers our dependency on foreign oil as well. This allows for gas prices to stay down 29-40 percent. One barrel of corn ethanol produced replaces 1.2 barrels of petroleum.
If you’re in the market for financing, whether it be for your crop operation or an ethanol plan be sure to contact Farm Plus Fianancial. Two ways to contact someone at Farm Plus, either by clicking here or call them toll free at 866-929-5585.
One of the most fun parts of having a farm is naming your new home. For most people it is a tough job putting a name on the one lifelong dream. A lot of people feel a farm should have a name so it sounds classy or businesslike. I think adding a name makes it personal and meaningful.
Names can come out of anywhere, but a lot of people name their farms after significant people, places, dreams or features of the land.
Onlineforums are dedicated to farmers looking for names, or looking to inspire others. Here are some very creative names:
*Rock Creek Gardens: Named after The Rock Creek that runs through this farm.
*Dogridge: This farm is home to dog lovers on acreage with rocky ridges through it.
*Busy Solitude Farm: Named after a quote by Votaire, “The happiest of all lives is a busy solitude.â€
* C ‘n’ J’s acres: C and J are the initials of the owners and sons.
Some states even allow you to register your farm name.
If you’ve dreamed of your own Fallen Oaks farm or C ‘n’ J’s Acres, it is a possibility! Farm loans are available. Check out the Farmer’s Financial Plus Web Site to learn more.
Look to what inspires your or is important to your life. Even if you don’t think it is “farmsy enough,†it will be creative and stand out.
Many people think the agriculture industry is in trouble, but there are many opportunities to secure a future in farming. A very popular farming method is organic farming. Today, society is greatly concerned with saving our planet and many people are turning to locally grown food. According to The Green Book (Rodgers and Kostigen, Three Rivers Press) 10-13 percent of our yearly energy is spent on food transport. Before food makes it to your home it generally travels 1500-2500 miles. Buying food locally from farms or farmer’s markets cuts this transport down by 95%.
Organic farms are a promising venture and in need. The more awareness brought to organic farming, the more people will want to buy locally. Not only do people look to buy locally, but they also want food free of preservatives. People want to have easy access to wholesome produce, meat and poultry.
The USDA has noticed the spike of interest and wants the public to know there are farm loans available for farms of all sizes.
It is important to keep in mind if you want to be considered an organic farm and sell 100% organic material, the farm and production must meet USDA Organic guidelines. In 1990 congress passed the Organic Food Production Act. This act generated a list of guidelines organic producers must follow to assure organic products met consistent standards.
To be qualified as organic, the USDA requires the following information:
* The type of operation to be certified;
* A history of substances applied to land for the previous 3 years
* The organic products being grown, raised, or processed;
* The organic system plan (OSP) – a plan describing practices and substances used in production. The OSP also must describe monitoring practices to be performed to
verify that the plan is effectively implemented, a record-keeping system, and practices to prevent commingling of organic and nonorganic products and to prevent contact of products with prohibited substances.
* Records must be kept for five years.
 In countless conversations over the past couple of months I hear one question often, ”Are farm loans still available?” The answer is yes, money for farm loans is just as available as it was before the so called “credit crunch.” Don’t get me wrong, the credit crunch is definately affecting a lot of Americans right now, just not the agricultural markets so much. The credit crunch hurts people who are looking for residential and commercial loans more than anyone. Agriculture still seems to be going fairly strong right now and so the availbility for farm loans is strong as well. You just have to know where to look.Â
We have seen an influctuation in customers deriving from rural banks who have denied their loan, even denied by lending relationships they’ve had for decades. Some agricultural banks are being spooked by small variences in their customers financials, small variences we are used to seeing and have no problems with. Most often, we are able to bring these customers in and serve them with a loan product better than they previously had. We love creating new lending relationships and we love having the ability to help our borrowers by providing a low cost farm loan. The last thing we want to see is a customer who can’t get the loan they need.Â
So, I decided to write a press release/article on the subject to help educate farmers and ranchers who are being turned away from their traditional banking relationships. We want farmers and ranchers to know there is an alternative to your one or two local banks and the alternative is almost always better. I hope the following article is helpful. Enjoy! Oh, and if you would like to speak with someone at Farm Plus Finacial please feel free to call us toll free at 866-929-5585 or click here.Â
Over the last several months, the economic situation in the United States has been steadily declining. However, while the economy may be suffering, money is still accessible for farmers and agriculturalindustries. In a recent primetime address concerning the state of the economy, George W. Bushclaimed, “if you own a business or a farm you would find it harder or more expensive to get credit.â€Â While it may be harder for Americans to borrow money for commercial and residential purposes,agricultural lending remains strong and interest rates are near historic lows.
Â
The recent economic crisis has dramatically weakened many sectors of the American economy. Onesector that continues to show strength, however, is agriculture. With a high demand for many types ofcommodities, agricultural real estate prices show increasing performance, with some areas producingdouble digit appreciation year after year. Given this remarkable agricultural strength, many financialinstitutions will make it a point to lend their money for farm and ranch purposes.
Â
Subprime mortgages are largely to blame for the current economic crisis. Financial institutions that haveinvested in these dangerous loans have suffered heavy losses, losses that have depleted the capitalavailable to loan to ordinary Americans. Many of the banks that risked money in subprime loans havebeen purchased by larger companies or, even worse, have filed for bankruptcy protection. For those ofyou unfamiliar with subprime mortgages, they are generally loans made to a borrower with a weakercredit profile than that of a prime borrower. Although there is no standardized definition, in the USsubprime loans are usually classified as those where the borrower has a credit score below a certainlevel, below a score of 660. Because of this weaker profile, subprime borrowers have a higher likelihoodof default than prime borrowers do. Subprime mortgages were securitized and sold on the secondarymarket to investors like Lehman Brothers, Bear Stearns, Washington Mutual, and IndyMac Bank, toname a few. The difficulties of many of these large scale banks and financial institutions are well known,but now even smaller community banks across the country are feeling the economic pinch; banks suchas Superior Bank of Hinsdale, Illinois, Main Street Bank of Northville, Michigan and Mutual Bank of ParkCity, Utah.
Â
In wake of the market turmoil many banks have rewritten underwriting guidelines and, in some cases,have frozen lending capital until America’s markets stabilize. Farmer Mac, on the other hand, is makingpositive, proactive moves during this recession. Charted in 1988, Farmer Mac (Federal AgriculturalMortgage Corporation) was created to provide relief to farmers in a time of double-digit interest rates. This government program guarantees the loan portion a financial institution would otherwise assume 100% risk of. A loan Institution that utilizes Farmer Mac’s guarantee program will have the ability to offer low interest rates and fixed terms to their customers. This enables the farmer or rancher to cut loan costs and increase the bottom line, ultimately ensuring that many agriculturalists will not see the effects of the “credit freeze.†Because of the financial strength and stability of Farmer Mac and the program’s persistence in product development, many financial institutions whose lending practices focused on farm and ranch operations have been fortunate enough to survive a tidal wave of bank closures and losses. One can only speculate what the future will hold, but many economists believe the agricultural community will continue its path of perseverance.
Â
On August 11, 2008, Farmer Mac announced that core earnings for the quarter ending June 30, 2008, had increased 28% over the comparable quarter in 2007. Furthermore, they announced a record guarantee portfolio of $9.8 billion. In addition to this information, Farmer Mac’s president, Henry D. Edelman, stated, “We are pleased with our continued strong performance, as evidenced by our second quarter core earnings. To date, the credit issues that have arisen in the housing and consumer sectors of the economy have not affected the agricultural economy in general or Farmer Mac’s guarantee portfolio in particular.†Historically low default rates were also quoted at just .11 percent. With continued growth, record loan volume, solid leadership and record low default rates you can rest assured Farmer Mac will be here today and tomorrow to help financial institutions provide outstanding loan products to their customers, the farmers.
Â
How to get a Farmer Mac loan:
Farmer Mac loans are secured by agricultural real estate. Farmers and ranchers can obtain one of these loans by requesting a loan through a Farmer Mac lender. You may use a Farmer Mac loan for refinance purposes or to purchase agricultural property. To learn more click here or call us toll free at 866-929-5585.
Â
Written by: Josh Mitchey, Business Development Manager, Farm Plus Financial.
Edited by: Justin Ellison, Dept. of History, University of Indiana