|
|
Posts Tagged ‘farm credit’
Sunday, January 1st, 2012
The recent rise in farm values has many farmers across the country ecstatic. While the past year has seen repeated bouts of poor weather that have been difficult for many farmers, the overall picture of American agriculture is exceedingly positive. While some regions are still struggling due to weather concerns, (Texas and the Southwest, for example, have seen land values drop because of the ongoing drought) they are exceptions rather than the rule.
Nationwide, the rise in ethanol production and international demand for major American commodities has led to increased land value, benefiting farmers across the country. 2011 saw farm values rise 17 percent in value from last year.
This increase has led some credit administrators to worry about the future of farm lending. According to the chair of the Farm Credit Administration Leland Strom, high land values warrant extreme caution on the part of lending agencies.
“Our job as a regulator, because the system loans to agriculture, is to ensure that proper underwriting standards are taken and there’s not an access of leverage being taken on by system institutions and lending into the ag sector.”
Despite these concerns, Strom remains committed to ensuring that struggling farmers have access to credit.
To learn more about agricultural financing opportunities contact a Farm Plus Financial representative by calling 866-929-5585 or by visiting www.farmplusfinancial.com.
Follow us on: Twitter
Written by: Justin Ellison / Farm Plus Staff Writer
Tags: ethanol, farm credit, land values Posted in General | No Comments »
Friday, February 4th, 2011
In 1781, in his Notes on the State of Virginia, Thomas Jefferson stated that the “cultivators of the earth are the most virtuous and independent citizens.” A few years later, in a letter to James Madison, he argued that farmers and small landowners were vital to the security and economic viability of the United States. Despite the many changes that American agriculture has undergone, it remains as important to the national economy today as it did in the eighteenth century. Beginning with Jeffersonian ideals of small yeomen farmers, to modern agribusiness, agricultural production has been a major factor in the economic stability of the US. Vital to this agricultural growth has been the development of agricultural lending practices that have made land available to cash strapped farmers. Beginning at the turn of the 20th century, the federal government has understood the value of making money available to agricultural concerns. Developing in tandem with the economic and industrial growth of the United States, lending practices and policies have helped propel agriculture in the United States and have preserved and protected this vital economic interest throughout the years.
The early Republic’s economy was primarily agrarian. The United States had few major industrial businesses and relied heavily on farming and agricultural development. At the same time, however, the early United States had few centralized banking institutions capable of dispensing credit. The Bank of the United States was short-lived and failed to provide significant credit to American farmers. The lack of farm credit, however, was not a significant problem in the eighteenth and early nineteenth century due to the structure of American agriculture. Large-scale Southern agriculture, the backbone of the US economy, was largely self-financed by wealthy plantation owners. Smaller Northern farms were much less commercialized and thus had little need for large-scale access to credit. The strength of American agriculture quickly made the United States a major economic power. Southern agricultural products, for example, drove Northern manufacturing and industry and the international export of American agricultural products generated millions of dollars in revenue. The sectional tensions of the 1850s and the Civil War helped to disrupt this traditional system and radically changed the structure of American agriculture. In 1862, Congress, emboldened by the secession of Southern states, passed the Homestead Act, opening up Western land to farmers and settlers. American citizens who had reached the age of majority could file claims for 160 acres of Western public land. After living on that land for five years and paying a small fee, up to ten dollars in the early years of the Act, they received title to the land. The Homestead Act, combined with increased Western land speculation, opened up the Great Plains and the Western United States to agricultural development and settlement and allowed for the future development and commercialization of American agriculture.
Following the Civil War, agricultural prices dropped. In addition, Gilded Age economic politics sought to control inflation and limit the cash supply in the United States. A strict gold standard helped keep currency out of supply. These economic policies tended to hit farmers hardest and, in the 1880s and 90s, various agricultural and rural political movements campaigned to expand credit to American farmers. Starting with the Grange movement and the Farmers Alliance, these groups eventually coalesced into the Populist Party. One the principle demands of the Populists was the creation of a subtreasury system, which was designed to help farmers get access to credit and to help increase the monetary supply. The subtreasury system would allow farmers to turn over major crops, such as wheat or cotton, to the federal government in exchange for loans up to 80% of the value of the crop. If the value of the crop rose above the value of the loan, the crops could be sold to settle the debt. If it did not, the crops would be forfeited to the government. Although the Populists never became a viable third party, their agricultural policies would resonate nationally.
Despite the political failure of the Populist Party, farmer’s concerns regarding credit were eventually adopted by the Democratic and Republican Parties. In the early 1900s, President Theodore Roosevelt created a commission to determine and address the major concerns of American farmers. Unsurprisingly, credit reform remained their principle political desire. In the election of 1912, all three major parties, the Democrats, Republicans, and the Progressive Party, endorsed platforms pledging to create an agricultural credit system. In 1913, Democratic President Woodrow Wilson sent a committee to Europe to study and report on the various agricultural credit systems implemented by the European Great Powers. In 1916, after two years of congressional debates, Congress passed the Farm Loan Act. The act authorized the creation of 12 federal land banks as well as a system of private land banks. The federal government provided the initial capital for the cooperative land banks and regulated and controlled the interest rates of agricultural loans. These land banks experienced sporadic growth in their early years. The late 1910s and early 1920s saw little growth in these credit institutions. Agricultural prices had risen in the mid 1900s and grew dramatically during World War 1. Higher farm prices eased the need for credit in many American farms. This agricultural boom was short-lived, however, and towards the end of the 1920s, farm prices fell and the US economy lurched into a serious depression.
In response to the postwar recession and the Great Depression, President Franklin Roosevelt, elected in 1932, took swift action to stabilize the agricultural sector. In addition to federal legislation regulating agricultural prices, Roosevelt provided additional loans to farmers through the Commodity Credit Corporation, created in 1933. The CCC was the realization of the subtreasury system advocated by the Farmers’ Alliance and the Populists in the late 1800s. The CCC allowed farmers to receive loans based on the prices for their particular crops. If the crop prices rose higher than the loan rate, farmers could sell their products, pay off their loan, and keep any profits. If it dropped below the loan rate than their crops were forfeit and the debt cancelled. In addition to the CCC, the federal government reformed the farm credit system through the passage of the 1933 Farm Mortgage Act and the Farm Credit Act. These acts unified federal agricultural credit organizations into the Farm Credit Administration. In addition, the Farm Mortgage Act expanded the activities of the federal land banks and increased the money available to farmers through emergency credit. The Farm Credit Act created production credit associations which made short and intermediate-term loans to farmers. It also created twelve district banks to support and extend credit to the cooperative associates. These Farm Credit Banks, along with the CCC, became the principal federal lenders to farmers and agricultural businesses. In 1937, the Roosevelt administration created the Farm Security Administration, which provided loans to farmers who needed assistance in meeting daily expenses in order to remain on their land. The FSA worked with famers, helping to assess the viability of their farms, developing soil conservation practices, while fashioning plans for farm operations and expenditures. In return for this large-scale government planning, farmers who otherwise could not receive loans from other financial institutions were able to stay on their land.
The beginning of World War 2 saw a significant increase in agricultural prices as domestic and international demand grew during the war years. Unlike the end of World War 1, agricultural prices remained high following the end of the war due to continued demand caused by the end of rationing in belligerent nations and the increased foreign aid sent to Europe and Asia. The postwar years in fact saw the increasing commercialization of farms throughout the United States. Increased prices allowed farmers to further mechanize their farms, and the increasing reliance on mechanical improvements and technological and chemical advancements completed the heretofore gradual commercialization of US agriculture. In 1930, for example, there were nearly 7 million farms in the United States. By 1970, there were only 3 million. Adapting to the changing nature of agriculture, the federal government took gradual steps to alter its existing agricultural lending apparatus. In 1972, Congress passed the Consolidated Farm and Rural Development Act, also known as the Con Act, which expanded the lending powers of the Department of Agriculture, empowering the agency to make direct ownership, operating, and emergency disaster loans to farmers. In addition, it allowed for rural development loans and grants.
The rural boom, which had lasted throughout the postwar years, abruptly ended in the 1980s. As inflation rose and farm prices dropped, the United States faced a serious agricultural depression. In response to the financial crisis, the government passed the Agricultural Credit Act of 1987. This act authorized a $4 billion package to aid fiscally vulnerable institutions of the Farm Credit System. It also served to restructure delinquent loans, created an insurance mechanism to protect FCS loans, and, most importantly, set up a secondary market for agricultural real estate loans through the creation of the Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation, better known as Farmer Mac. Designed to help the struggling Farm Credit System, Farmer Mac established a secondary agricultural real estate market and increased long-term credit with stable interest rates to farmers and ranchers. In order to meet its goals, Farmer Mac purchases agricultural loans from lenders, replenishing their funds and allowing them to make further loans to agricultural borrowers. In order to fund their purchases, Farmer Mac sells debts and securities on the capital market, guaranteeing a flow of money from Wall Street investors to rural farmers. Since its creation in 1987, Farmer Mac’s authority has been modified four times. In 1990, Congress created the Farmer Mac II program, at the request of the USDA, which provides the support of the secondary market to USDA guaranteed loans and allows lenders to sell portions of guaranteed USDA loans to Farmer Mac. In 1991, Farmer Mac was amended and subjected to moderate capital regulation by the federal government, in 1996 its purchasing processes were streamlined, and in 2008 Farmer Mac was allowed to purchase loans made to finance electrification and telecommunication improvements in rural areas. The modifications made in the 1990s transformed Farmer Mac into a widely profitable institution. Since 1995, Farmer Mac has increased its capital from $12 million to over $100 million in 2001.
Thanks in part to thoughtful government actions and regulations, Farmer Mac, unlike similar government-sponsored enterprises like Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, remains fiscally sound and has weathered the current economic crisis. While government actions to manage and regulate agriculture lending may have lagged over the years in comparison to other forms of banking and credit developments, the government has frequently taken decisive action to protect and support agriculture in the United States. The development of farm lending systems and institutions has helped the agricultural sector develop into the economically powerful system that exists today.
Jasper Womach, “Congressional Research Service: Agriculture: A Glossary of Terms, Programs, and Laws, 2005 Edition,” June 16, 2005, 61-62.
Tags: ag finance, agriculture history, farm credit, farm finance, farm loans, homestead act Posted in General | No Comments »
Wednesday, January 14th, 2009
 In countless conversations over the past couple of months I hear one question often, ”Are farm loans still available?” The answer is yes, money for farm loans is just as available as it was before the so called “credit crunch.” Don’t get me wrong, the credit crunch is definately affecting a lot of Americans right now, just not the agricultural markets so much. The credit crunch hurts people who are looking for residential and commercial loans more than anyone. Agriculture still seems to be going fairly strong right now and so the availbility for farm loans is strong as well. You just have to know where to look.Â
We have seen an influctuation in customers deriving from rural banks who have denied their loan, even denied by lending relationships they’ve had for decades. Some agricultural banks are being spooked by small variences in their customers financials, small variences we are used to seeing and have no problems with. Most often, we are able to bring these customers in and serve them with a loan product better than they previously had. We love creating new lending relationships and we love having the ability to help our borrowers by providing a low cost farm loan. The last thing we want to see is a customer who can’t get the loan they need.Â
So, I decided to write a press release/article on the subject to help educate farmers and ranchers who are being turned away from their traditional banking relationships. We want farmers and ranchers to know there is an alternative to your one or two local banks and the alternative is almost always better. I hope the following article is helpful. Enjoy! Oh, and if you would like to speak with someone at Farm Plus Finacial please feel free to call us toll free at 866-929-5585 or click here.Â
Over the last several months, the economic situation in the United States has been steadily declining. However, while the economy may be suffering, money is still accessible for farmers and agricultural industries. In a recent primetime address concerning the state of the economy, George W. Bush claimed, “if you own a business or a farm you would find it harder or more expensive to get credit.â€Â While it may be harder for Americans to borrow money for commercial and residential purposes, agricultural lending remains strong and interest rates are near historic lows.
Â
The recent economic crisis has dramatically weakened many sectors of the American economy. One sector that continues to show strength, however, is agriculture. With a high demand for many types of commodities, agricultural real estate prices show increasing performance, with some areas producing double digit appreciation year after year. Given this remarkable agricultural strength, many financial institutions will make it a point to lend their money for farm and ranch purposes.
Â
Subprime mortgages are largely to blame for the current economic crisis. Financial institutions that have invested in these dangerous loans have suffered heavy losses, losses that have depleted the capital available to loan to ordinary Americans. Many of the banks that risked money in subprime loans have been purchased by larger companies or, even worse, have filed for bankruptcy protection. For those of you unfamiliar with subprime mortgages, they are generally loans made to a borrower with a weaker credit profile than that of a prime borrower. Although there is no standardized definition, in the US subprime loans are usually classified as those where the borrower has a credit score below a certain level, below a score of 660. Because of this weaker profile, subprime borrowers have a higher likelihood of default than prime borrowers do. Subprime mortgages were securitized and sold on the secondary market to investors like Lehman Brothers, Bear Stearns, Washington Mutual, and IndyMac Bank, to name a few. The difficulties of many of these large scale banks and financial institutions are well known, but now even smaller community banks across the country are feeling the economic pinch; banks such as Superior Bank of Hinsdale, Illinois, Main Street Bank of Northville, Michigan and Mutual Bank of Park City, Utah.
Â
In wake of the market turmoil many banks have rewritten underwriting guidelines and, in some cases, have frozen lending capital until America’s markets stabilize. Farmer Mac, on the other hand, is making positive, proactive moves during this recession. Charted in 1988, Farmer Mac (Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation) was created to provide relief to farmers in a time of double-digit interest rates. This government program guarantees the loan portion a financial institution would otherwise assume 100% risk of. A loan Institution that utilizes Farmer Mac’s guarantee program will have the ability to offer low interest rates and fixed terms to their customers. This enables the farmer or rancher to cut loan costs and increase the bottom line, ultimately ensuring that many agriculturalists will not see the effects of the “credit freeze.†Because of the financial strength and stability of Farmer Mac and the program’s persistence in product development, many financial institutions whose lending practices focused on farm and ranch operations have been fortunate enough to survive a tidal wave of bank closures and losses. One can only speculate what the future will hold, but many economists believe the agricultural community will continue its path of perseverance.
Â
On August 11, 2008, Farmer Mac announced that core earnings for the quarter ending June 30, 2008, had increased 28% over the comparable quarter in 2007. Furthermore, they announced a record guarantee portfolio of $9.8 billion. In addition to this information, Farmer Mac’s president, Henry D. Edelman, stated, “We are pleased with our continued strong performance, as evidenced by our second quarter core earnings. To date, the credit issues that have arisen in the housing and consumer sectors of the economy have not affected the agricultural economy in general or Farmer Mac’s guarantee portfolio in particular.†Historically low default rates were also quoted at just .11 percent. With continued growth, record loan volume, solid leadership and record low default rates you can rest assured Farmer Mac will be here today and tomorrow to help financial institutions provide outstanding loan products to their customers, the farmers.
Â
How to get a Farmer Mac loan:
Farmer Mac loans are secured by agricultural real estate. Farmers and ranchers can obtain one of these loans by requesting a loan through a Farmer Mac lender. You may use a Farmer Mac loan for refinance purposes or to purchase agricultural property. To learn more click here or call us toll free at 866-929-5585.
Â
Written by: Josh Mitchey, Business Development Manager, Farm Plus Financial.
Edited by: Justin Ellison, Dept. of History, University of Indiana
Thanks for reading!
Tags: Add new tag, ag loan, ag loans, agricultural finance, farm credit, farm loan, farm loans, farmer mac, ranch loan, ranch loans Posted in General | No Comments »
|
|
|
|